Malaysian vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,243,890 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 32.6%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Malaysian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	0.81%	1.1%
Maximum	60.0%	24.4%
Range	59.2%	23.3%
Mean	21.1%	12.0%
Median	18.5%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.8%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	25.6%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.8%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.9%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.8%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Hmong	10.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 17.5%
Sierra Leoneans	8.9 /100 \| #208	Tragic 17.6%
Panamanians	8.7 /100 \| #209	Tragic 17.6%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	7.3 /100 \| #210	Tragic 17.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	6.4 /100 \| #211	Tragic 17.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	6.3 /100 \| #212	Tragic 17.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	5.7 /100 \| #213	Tragic 17.8%
Malaysians	5.7 /100 \| #214	Tragic 17.8%
German Russians	5.7 /100 \| #215	Tragic 17.8%
Moroccans	5.5 /100 \| #216	Tragic 17.8%
Japanese	5.3 /100 \| #217	Tragic 17.8%
Alaska Natives	5.2 /100 \| #218	Tragic 17.8%
Immigrants \| Panama	4.7 /100 \| #219	Tragic 17.9%
Cubans	4.1 /100 \| #220	Tragic 18.0%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	3.5 /100 \| #221	Tragic 18.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%