Macedonian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
COMPARE
Macedonian
Chickasaw
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Macedonians
Chickasaw
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
89.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,628,728 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.95%.

Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.80% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 11.4% | 17.6% |
Range | 10.6% | 17.1% |
Mean | 4.9% | 5.6% |
Median | 4.7% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Chickasaw by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Lebanese (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Germany (5.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and American (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
South Africans | 92.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Argentineans | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 91.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 91.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 91.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 90.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 89.7 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
Macedonians | 89.7 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
Lebanese | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |