Macedonian vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Macedonian
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Macedonians
Chickasaw
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,627,302 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 59.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 4.5% | 15.2% |
| Range | 4.4% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 1.9% | 5.4% |
| Median | 1.9% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.79% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.73% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.73% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |