Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chilean Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,437,718 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,472,844 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.563 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.63%.

Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Micronesia	Chilean
Minimum	0.50%	2.9%
Maximum	38.1%	45.4%
Range	37.6%	42.5%
Mean	14.7%	13.4%
Median	11.1%	11.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.2%	8.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.2%	14.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.0%	6.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.5%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.3%	9.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Chileans by Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

In terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Basque (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Slovak (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Malaysian (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Italian (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Scotland (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Jordan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Iranian (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	93.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	93.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 11.3%
Chileans	93.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	92.9 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	92.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 11.3%
Iranians	92.0 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	91.5 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| France	90.3 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Austria	90.3 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 11.3%
Fijians	90.2 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	89.9 /100 \| #114	Excellent 11.3%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	89.9 /100 \| #115	Excellent 11.3%
Burmese	89.8 /100 \| #116	Excellent 11.3%
Sri Lankans	89.8 /100 \| #117	Excellent 11.3%
Afghans	89.7 /100 \| #118	Excellent 11.3%
Immigrants \| Scotland	89.2 /100 \| #119	Excellent 11.4%
Malaysians	89.0 /100 \| #120	Excellent 11.4%
Slovaks	88.9 /100 \| #121	Excellent 11.4%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	88.1 /100 \| #122	Excellent 11.4%
Basques	87.8 /100 \| #123	Excellent 11.4%
Italians	87.2 /100 \| #124	Excellent 11.4%