Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Poland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,951,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Poland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Immigrants from Poland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $61,041, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($39,608 compared to $45,979, a difference of 16.1%), and median family income ($95,402 compared to $108,570, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $55,474, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $41,630, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 54.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 35.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.1%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 37.0%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.15%), family households (65.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 50.8%), master's degree (10.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 50.1%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 75.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 42.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.2%).