Icelander vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,841,412 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 127.7 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $37,842, a difference of 18.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $52,888, a difference of 15.9%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $91,763, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $50,852, a difference of 0.78%), median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $50,878, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($46,916 compared to $42,615, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 37.7%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.38%), female poverty (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 57.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 44.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 12.2%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.29%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 0.83%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.0%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 48.7%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.93%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%).