Icelander vs Pakistani Community Comparison

COMPARE

Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Icelanders

Pakistanis

Good
Good
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pakistani Integration in Icelander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,853,280 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.321% in Pakistanis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 320.5 Pakistanis.
Icelander Integration in Pakistani Communities

Icelander vs Pakistani Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.4%), median household income ($85,797 compared to $89,638, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $63,844, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,987 compared to $45,587, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $56,719, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($46,916 compared to $48,254, a difference of 2.9%).
Icelander vs Pakistani Income
Income MetricIcelanderPakistani
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$44,987
Excellent
$45,587
Median Family Income
Good
$104,282
Exceptional
$107,390
Median Household Income
Good
$85,797
Exceptional
$89,638
Median Earnings
Good
$46,916
Exceptional
$48,254
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,415
Excellent
$56,719
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,109
Excellent
$40,596
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,247
Exceptional
$53,325
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,560
Excellent
$98,401
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,261
Exceptional
$105,317
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,270
Exceptional
$63,844
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Fair
26.1%

Icelander vs Pakistani Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.4%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.20%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and female poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Icelander vs Pakistani Poverty
Poverty MetricIcelanderPakistani
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Excellent
11.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Good
11.0%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.5%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.4%

Icelander vs Pakistani Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Icelander vs Pakistani Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIcelanderPakistani
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.0%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%

Icelander vs Pakistani Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.42%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
Icelander vs Pakistani Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIcelanderPakistani
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Excellent
37.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Average
82.8%

Icelander vs Pakistani Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in family households (63.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.28%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.63%).
Icelander vs Pakistani Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIcelanderPakistani
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Excellent
30.5%

Icelander vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.25%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Icelander vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIcelanderPakistani
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.0%

Icelander vs Pakistani Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.7%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.13%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
Icelander vs Pakistani Education Level
Education Level MetricIcelanderPakistani
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Excellent
86.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
67.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
61.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Excellent
48.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.5%
Excellent
39.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%

Icelander vs Pakistani Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 0.16%), female disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
Icelander vs Pakistani Disability
Disability MetricIcelanderPakistani
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Average
11.7%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Average
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Good
2.4%