Icelander vs Polish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Polish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Icelanders

Poles

Good
Excellent
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,413
SOCIAL INDEX
81.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
72nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Polish Integration in Icelander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,470,336 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Poles. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 89.7 Poles.
Icelander Integration in Polish Communities

Icelander vs Polish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Polish communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $58,139, a difference of 4.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $99,685, a difference of 4.3%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $108,507, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $61,598, a difference of 0.53%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $52,407, a difference of 2.3%), and per capita income ($44,987 compared to $46,123, a difference of 2.5%).
Icelander vs Polish Income
Income MetricIcelanderPolish
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$44,987
Exceptional
$46,123
Median Family Income
Good
$104,282
Exceptional
$108,507
Median Household Income
Good
$85,797
Excellent
$88,472
Median Earnings
Good
$46,916
Exceptional
$48,659
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,415
Exceptional
$58,139
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,109
Excellent
$40,371
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,247
Good
$52,407
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,560
Exceptional
$99,685
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,261
Exceptional
$105,952
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,270
Good
$61,598
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
28.5%

Icelander vs Polish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Polish communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 19.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
Icelander vs Polish Poverty
Poverty MetricIcelanderPolish
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Poor
13.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%

Icelander vs Polish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Polish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 46.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.71%).
Icelander vs Polish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIcelanderPolish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%

Icelander vs Polish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Polish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.94%).
Icelander vs Polish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIcelanderPolish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
42.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
77.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Icelander vs Polish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Polish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.56%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Icelander vs Polish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIcelanderPolish
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.09
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Good
30.8%

Icelander vs Polish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Polish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.9%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.45%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.4%).
Icelander vs Polish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIcelanderPolish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Average
6.4%

Icelander vs Polish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Polish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Icelander vs Polish Education Level
Education Level MetricIcelanderPolish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
91.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Excellent
48.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.5%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Excellent
15.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Icelander vs Polish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Polish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.8%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Icelander vs Polish Disability
Disability MetricIcelanderPolish
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Exceptional
45.3%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%