Icelander vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,261,629 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to a decrease of 29.9 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $41,495, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $55,543, a difference of 8.4%), and wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $39,376, a difference of 0.68%), median earnings ($46,916 compared to $46,333, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $93,661, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.44%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.49%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 70.8%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.4%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 24.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.6%).