Costa Rican vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Pima
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Costa Ricans
Pima
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
68.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,285,350 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 84.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Pima |
Minimum | 1.2% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.8% | 89.3% |
Mean | 15.3% | 38.9% |
Median | 14.3% | 35.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 51.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 29.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 22.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Colombian (16.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Oceania (16.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 63.6 /100 | #166 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 55.4 /100 | #167 | Average 16.3% |
South Americans | 55.3 /100 | #168 | Average 16.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 53.6 /100 | #169 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.7 /100 | #170 | Average 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |