Armenian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Chinese
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,765,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 13.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Chinese |
Minimum | 6.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 43.0% |
Range | 53.3% | 41.7% |
Mean | 18.8% | 16.1% |
Median | 16.5% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |