Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from England
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Immigrants from England

Excellent
Good
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,183
SOCIAL INDEX
79.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
83rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from England Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,955,770 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.781. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.882% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 882.5 Immigrants from England.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from England Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $48,844, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $41,277, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $49,722, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $65,715, a difference of 1.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $109,446, a difference of 2.3%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from England
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Exceptional
$48,844
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Exceptional
$112,038
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Exceptional
$92,098
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Exceptional
$49,722
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Exceptional
$59,527
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Exceptional
$41,277
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Fair
$51,817
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Exceptional
$102,020
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Exceptional
$109,446
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Exceptional
$65,715
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
27.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from England
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from England
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Good
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Good
5.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from England
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Exceptional
38.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Fair
82.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.4%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.19%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.97%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from England
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Good
31.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.9%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from England
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
58.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
6.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from England
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
87.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from England Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from England
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
12.0%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Good
2.4%