Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,151,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Immigrants from England.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($65,329 compared to $51,817, a difference of 26.1%), wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and per capita income ($45,195 compared to $48,844, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,936 compared to $102,020, a difference of 0.080%), median household income ($91,991 compared to $92,098, a difference of 0.12%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,201 compared to $109,446, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (11.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 42.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (13.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 42.0%), and single male poverty (9.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 41.4%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (50.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.9%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.63%), 4th grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.070%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%).