Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,037,732 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 41.9 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $102,123, a difference of 11.7%), and per capita income ($39,827 compared to $44,440, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $38,397, a difference of 0.97%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $50,554, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $46,463, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 41.2%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 1.5%), single female poverty (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.5%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 54.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 122.4%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.2%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.9%).