Immigrants from Belarus vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,927,043 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.391% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 390.8 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $38,397, a difference of 16.6%), median earnings ($53,043 compared to $46,463, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $94,622, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $61,735, a difference of 0.69%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $102,123, a difference of 9.1%), and median family income ($114,586 compared to $104,288, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 31.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 28.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 25.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 23.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 147.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 12.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 45.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.6%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.3% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 61.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.66%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%).