Luxembourger vs Pakistani Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Pakistanis

Excellent
Good
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pakistani Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,843,389 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.148% in Pakistanis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 148.2 Pakistanis.
Luxembourger Integration in Pakistani Communities

Luxembourger vs Pakistani Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,325, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $63,844, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,663 compared to $45,587, a difference of 0.17%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $56,719, a difference of 0.74%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $107,390, a difference of 1.1%).
Luxembourger vs Pakistani Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerPakistani
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Excellent
$45,587
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$107,390
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$89,638
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$48,254
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Excellent
$56,719
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Excellent
$40,596
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$53,325
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Excellent
$98,401
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$105,317
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$63,844
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Fair
26.1%

Luxembourger vs Pakistani Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.0%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.2%).
Luxembourger vs Pakistani Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerPakistani
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.4%

Luxembourger vs Pakistani Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.9%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Luxembourger vs Pakistani Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerPakistani
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%

Luxembourger vs Pakistani Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Pakistani Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerPakistani
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Excellent
37.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Average
82.8%

Luxembourger vs Pakistani Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.4%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Luxembourger vs Pakistani Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerPakistani
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Excellent
30.5%

Luxembourger vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 67.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
Luxembourger vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerPakistani
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Luxembourger vs Pakistani Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
Luxembourger vs Pakistani Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerPakistani
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Excellent
86.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
67.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
61.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Excellent
48.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Excellent
39.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%

Luxembourger vs Pakistani Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Luxembourger vs Pakistani Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerPakistani
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.7%
Males
Good
11.1%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Average
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.4%