Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,886,700 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 60.9 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $50,950, a difference of 36.2%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $62,057, a difference of 29.3%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $115,523, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $55,022, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $64,828, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.4%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.8%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.3%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.5%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (67.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.9%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 72.5%), no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.2%).