Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Egypt Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,028,537 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Egypt. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Immigrants from Egypt.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 38.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $109,941, a difference of 26.3%), and median family income ($89,268 compared to $111,689, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $54,239, a difference of 6.3%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $42,837, a difference of 10.9%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $50,901, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 64.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 34.5%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.1%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 28.2%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.1%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.6%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 2.3%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.4%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.3%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.9%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.0%).