Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Egypt Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,326,175 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in Immigrants from Egypt. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 91.1 Immigrants from Egypt.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $103,192, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $54,239, a difference of 5.6%), and per capita income ($45,066 compared to $47,361, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.63%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $64,299, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $109,941, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.7%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.060%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.0%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and family households (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 41.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.1%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and bachelor's degree (40.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.8% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.14%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%).