Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,499,975 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 10.7 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $50,417, a difference of 11.5%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $60,914, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $51,581, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $54,343, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $63,168, a difference of 2.0%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.47%), currently married (46.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.6%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.6%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.90%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 3.0%).