Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,302,937 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 87.3 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,801 compared to $63,168, a difference of 8.9%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and median family income ($120,445 compared to $112,323, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $43,258, a difference of 0.90%), median earnings ($53,186 compared to $51,581, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $54,343, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.0%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and single female poverty (20.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.4%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.27%), and family households (62.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.2%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.3%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.12%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.0%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.65%).