Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,272,198 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 11.6 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.5%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $41,261, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $52,202, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,472 compared to $93,919, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $90,266, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $79,664, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 32.8%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.31%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 44.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 12.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.030%), family households (62.6% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 150.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 59.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 21.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 49.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.0%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (86.7% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.010%), ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.43%).