Luxembourger vs Barbadian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Barbadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Barbadians

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,346
SOCIAL INDEX
11.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
313th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Barbadian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,643,155 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 55.6 Barbadians.
Luxembourger Integration in Barbadian Communities

Luxembourger vs Barbadian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 44.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $90,266, a difference of 14.7%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $93,919, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $41,261, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $52,202, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $45,846, a difference of 3.9%).
Luxembourger vs Barbadian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerBarbadian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Poor
$42,406
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$93,919
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$79,664
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Fair
$45,846
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$51,236
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$41,261
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Average
$52,202
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$89,565
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$90,266
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$54,163
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
19.0%

Luxembourger vs Barbadian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 80.6%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 62.0%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.71%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Luxembourger vs Barbadian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerBarbadian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
20.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
20.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
30.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
16.5%

Luxembourger vs Barbadian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 51.1%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Luxembourger vs Barbadian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerBarbadian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.4%

Luxembourger vs Barbadian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 46.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Luxembourger vs Barbadian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerBarbadian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.6%

Luxembourger vs Barbadian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.2%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Luxembourger vs Barbadian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerBarbadian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
39.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
40.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
37.0%

Luxembourger vs Barbadian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 387.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 69.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 28.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 54.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 66.1%).
Luxembourger vs Barbadian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerBarbadian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
26.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
74.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
38.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
12.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
3.9%

Luxembourger vs Barbadian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Luxembourger vs Barbadian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerBarbadian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
89.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
82.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
56.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Poor
36.1%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Luxembourger vs Barbadian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.49%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.1%).
Luxembourger vs Barbadian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerBarbadian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Good
11.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
24.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%