Immigrants from Oceania vs Romanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,946,570 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 10.9 Romanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.0%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $60,063, a difference of 7.8%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $48,445, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,632, a difference of 0.090%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $64,142, a difference of 0.43%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $91,994, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.66%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.9%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.56%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.0%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.5%).