Bhutanese vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Romanians

Exceptional
Excellent
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 344,278,768 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Romanians.
Bhutanese Integration in Romanian Communities

Bhutanese vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $64,142, a difference of 12.7%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $91,994, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $108,609, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $60,063, a difference of 2.8%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $48,445, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Bhutanese vs Romanian Income
Income MetricBhutaneseRomanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Bhutanese vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.7%).
Bhutanese vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseRomanian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.4%

Bhutanese vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Bhutanese vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Bhutanese vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Bhutanese vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Good
83.0%

Bhutanese vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.6%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.39%), currently married (48.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Bhutanese vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseRomanian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.7%

Bhutanese vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.9%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.2%).
Bhutanese vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
6.2%

Bhutanese vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.3%), college, 1 year or more (64.6% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and associate's degree (51.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Bhutanese vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Bhutanese vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Bhutanese vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseRomanian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Good
2.4%