Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,690,802 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $54,512, a difference of 3.4%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $69,426, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $119,094, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($99,933 compared to $99,943, a difference of 0.010%), median earnings ($53,310 compared to $53,268, a difference of 0.080%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $44,161, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.1%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.090%), single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.8%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.4%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.38%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.38%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.68%).