Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,292,971 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 98.0 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $42,412, a difference of 13.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $55,924, a difference of 11.5%), and median family income ($109,418 compared to $100,984, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $54,105, a difference of 0.71%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $39,788, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 31.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.21%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.9%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.7%).