Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,430,078 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.705. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $42,412, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $95,512, a difference of 26.3%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $84,740, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $55,924, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $54,105, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 65.2%), single male poverty (19.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 58.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 11.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.5%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.1%), bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (87.7% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.6%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.2%).