Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,684,343 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 51.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $89,394, a difference of 30.4%), and median family income ($118,291 compared to $92,419, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $41,685, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $53,163, a difference of 6.0%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $45,816, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 68.0%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.7%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 41.2%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.3%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 171.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 87.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 26.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 57.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 72.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.5%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 41.2%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.9%).