Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,959,927 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 21.5 Immigrants from Vietnam.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $55,562, a difference of 8.2%), per capita income ($45,066 compared to $43,229, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $63,014, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $106,417, a difference of 0.24%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $106,186, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 14.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and poverty (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.5%), family households (65.0% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.40%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.2%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).