Japanese vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,894,027 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Dominican Republic. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 26.1 Immigrants from Dominican Republic.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $45,758, a difference of 26.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $78,836, a difference of 22.8%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $81,233, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $50,204, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $36,857, a difference of 4.5%), and per capita income ($39,870 compared to $37,306, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 57.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 51.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 28.3%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.15%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 233.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 135.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 109.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 32.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 73.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 109.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.8%), college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and college, 1 year or more (55.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.8%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 0.11%), male disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.8%).