Palestinian vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,679,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Palestinian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Palestinians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Palestinians corresponds to an increase of 5.7 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,790 compared to $34,974, a difference of 30.9%), median family income ($109,413 compared to $85,050, a difference of 28.6%), and median male earnings ($57,778 compared to $45,538, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,515 compared to $51,022, a difference of 0.97%), wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,800 compared to $53,420, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 52.8%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 45.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.86%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 39.3%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 5.0%), married-couple households (48.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 88.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 68.9%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.7%).