Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Average
Poor
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,097,673 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.901. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.390% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 389.8 Immigrants from Bangladesh.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.4%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $55,394, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $92,208, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $39,910, a difference of 0.97%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $54,714, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $45,532, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Bangladesh
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Poor
$41,709
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Tragic
$94,665
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Tragic
$80,722
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Tragic
$51,642
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Good
$39,910
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Exceptional
$54,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Tragic
$90,448
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Tragic
$92,208
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Tragic
$55,394
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Exceptional
20.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 49.1%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 8.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Bangladesh
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Good
8.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
15.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Bangladesh
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Bangladesh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Tragic
30.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
80.7%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Bangladesh
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Good
30.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 164.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 95.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 48.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 74.2%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
25.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
74.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
38.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
3.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.2%), college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
92.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
91.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Tragic
85.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 36.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.050%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Bangladesh
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%