Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,536,218 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 22.9 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $106,103, a difference of 47.0%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $52,503, a difference of 47.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $113,140, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $52,400, a difference of 21.1%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $42,824, a difference of 24.8%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 59.1%), family poverty (11.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 55.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.46%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 55.2%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.12, a difference of 3.7%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households (59.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 65.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 53.1%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%), male disability (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%).