Uruguayan vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,738,247 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.923. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.339% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 339.0 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,656 compared to $117,780, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $51,731, a difference of 16.7%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $62,516, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $55,571, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $66,892, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.81%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.31%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.2%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 31.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.3%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.1%).