Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,142,130 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.458. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.518% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 518.4 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $35,897, a difference of 32.0%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $88,358, a difference of 23.2%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $46,744, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $47,589, a difference of 9.1%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $35,960, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 51.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.2%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.9%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 89.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 80.5%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.1%).