Japanese vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Japanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Japanese

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Japanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,842,719 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 33.7 Luxembourgers.
Japanese Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Japanese vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.3%), per capita income ($39,870 compared to $45,663, a difference of 14.5%), and median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $56,300, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $39,891, a difference of 3.5%), median household income ($83,395 compared to $86,418, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $50,379, a difference of 3.9%).
Japanese vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricJapaneseLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,870
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,288
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,395
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,825
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,473
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,528
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,365
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,624
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,834
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,919
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Japanese vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 43.2%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Japanese vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricJapaneseLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Japanese vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.2%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Japanese vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJapaneseLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Japanese vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Japanese vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJapaneseLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.0%

Japanese vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
Japanese vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJapaneseLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.2%
Exceptional
29.4%

Japanese vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 76.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Japanese vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJapaneseLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
6.6%

Japanese vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 110.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Japanese vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricJapaneseLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.9%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.3%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%

Japanese vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.58%), male disability (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Japanese vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricJapaneseLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%