Welsh vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Welsh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Welsh

Luxembourgers

Good
Excellent
6,335
SOCIAL INDEX
60.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
156th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Welsh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,019,257 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Welsh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Welsh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Welsh corresponds to an increase of 35.0 Luxembourgers.
Welsh Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Welsh vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Welsh and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,233 compared to $45,663, a difference of 5.6%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($37,856 compared to $39,891, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,597 compared to $50,379, a difference of 0.43%), householder income over 65 years ($60,666 compared to $60,967, a difference of 0.50%), and median male earnings ($54,647 compared to $56,300, a difference of 3.0%).
Welsh vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricWelshLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,233
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Average
$102,151
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,628
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,710
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,647
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,856
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,597
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,039
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,322
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,666
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.9%
Tragic
27.4%

Welsh vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Welsh and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.080%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Welsh vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricWelshLuxembourger
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.4%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.1%

Welsh vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Welsh and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Welsh vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricWelshLuxembourger
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%

Welsh vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Welsh and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Welsh vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricWelshLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.3%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.0%

Welsh vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Welsh and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.8%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and married-couple households (48.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
Welsh vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricWelshLuxembourger
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Exceptional
29.4%

Welsh vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.1%).
Welsh vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricWelshLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.8%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Excellent
6.6%

Welsh vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Welsh and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.2%), bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 8th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Welsh vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricWelshLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.0%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.5%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Excellent
1.9%

Welsh vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 10.9%).
Welsh vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricWelshLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
47.0%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%