Cherokee vs Luxembourger Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Luxembourger
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Luxembourgers
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Luxembourger Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,152,858 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 111.0 Luxembourgers.
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $45,663, a difference of 22.7%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $106,183, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $97,237, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $60,967, a difference of 12.6%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Exceptional $45,663 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Excellent $106,183 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Good $86,418 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Excellent $47,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Excellent $56,300 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Average $39,891 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Tragic $50,379 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Excellent $97,237 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Excellent $103,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Average $60,967 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 27.4% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 48.6%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 14.8%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 66.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 45.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 86.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 24.6%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 94.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Excellent 6.6% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 35.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 39.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 46.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.0%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |