Canadian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,318,266 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.950. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.304% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 304.3 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $50,379, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $60,967, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,597 compared to $106,183, a difference of 0.39%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $97,237, a difference of 0.40%), and median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $39,891, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.2%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.14%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.9%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.4%), associate's degree (47.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.5%).