Romanian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Luxembourgers

Excellent
Excellent
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,041,722 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 203.8 Luxembourgers.
Romanian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Romanian vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $56,300, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $50,379, a difference of 6.5%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $86,418, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $39,891, a difference of 4.4%), and median family income ($111,243 compared to $106,183, a difference of 4.8%).
Romanian vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricRomanianLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Romanian vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.7%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and single female poverty (19.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Romanian vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianLuxembourger
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Romanian vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Romanian vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianLuxembourger
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Romanian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Romanian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
85.0%

Romanian vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.2%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Romanian vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianLuxembourger
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
29.4%

Romanian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 104.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.9%).
Romanian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Romanian vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.4%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Romanian vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
1.9%

Romanian vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.7%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Romanian vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricRomanianLuxembourger
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Average
11.2%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%