Finnish vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Finnish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Finns

Luxembourgers

Good
Excellent
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Finnish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,229,948 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Luxembourgers.
Finnish Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Finnish vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,461 compared to $45,663, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $39,891, a difference of 4.5%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $60,967, a difference of 2.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $97,237, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $50,379, a difference of 2.9%).
Finnish vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricFinnishLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,461
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Average
$102,676
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,607
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,940
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,721
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,173
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,827
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,610
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$99,904
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,535
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Tragic
27.4%

Finnish vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.8%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.93%).
Finnish vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricFinnishLuxembourger
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Poor
21.5%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.0%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Finnish vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Finnish vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFinnishLuxembourger
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Finnish vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Finnish vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFinnishLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.9%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.7%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Exceptional
85.0%

Finnish vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.09 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.27%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.70%).
Finnish vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFinnishLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.09
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Exceptional
29.4%

Finnish vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
Finnish vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFinnishLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.3%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Excellent
6.6%

Finnish vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.6%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Finnish vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricFinnishLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.7%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Excellent
1.9%

Finnish vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.2%).
Finnish vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricFinnishLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%