Crow vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,452,491 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $45,663, a difference of 43.9%), wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 43.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $103,536, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $50,379, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,891, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $47,640, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 146.5%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 123.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 107.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.4%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 46.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 47.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 264.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 247.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 234.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.5%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 37.1%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 106.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 46.2%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 44.4%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.20%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.3%).