Samoan vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Samoans

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Samoan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,380,880 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Luxembourgers.
Samoan Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Samoan vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $45,663, a difference of 14.6%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $56,300, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $50,379, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,498 compared to $86,418, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $103,536, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,385 compared to $97,237, a difference of 5.2%).
Samoan vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricSamoanLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,826
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,344
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Good
$86,498
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,206
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,389
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,498
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,610
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,385
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,580
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,427
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Samoan vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 25.9%), and single father poverty (13.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.18%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Samoan vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricSamoanLuxembourger
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Good
10.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Samoan vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.0%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Samoan vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSamoanLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Samoan vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Samoan vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSamoanLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
85.0%

Samoan vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.6%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.37%), currently married (46.8% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
Samoan vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSamoanLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.6%
Exceptional
29.4%

Samoan vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.6%).
Samoan vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSamoanLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
25.0%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Samoan vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.4%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
Samoan vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricSamoanLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.9%

Samoan vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.9%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Samoan vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricSamoanLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.5%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%