Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bangladeshi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bangladeshis

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Bangladeshi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,076,230 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Luxembourgers.
Bangladeshi Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,897 compared to $45,663, a difference of 27.2%), wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and median male earnings ($46,744 compared to $56,300, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,589 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.9%), median female earnings ($35,960 compared to $39,891, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $60,967, a difference of 11.4%).
Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricBangladeshiLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,897
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,358
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,112
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,263
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,744
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,960
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,589
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,363
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,402
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,719
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
27.4%

Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 64.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 54.9%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.9%).
Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricBangladeshiLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
24.2%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.7%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.1%

Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.1%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.5%).
Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBangladeshiLuxembourger
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBangladeshiLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.5%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
85.0%

Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 46.4%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.7%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.10, a difference of 8.6%).
Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBangladeshiLuxembourger
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
29.4%

Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 61.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBangladeshiLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.4%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 123.0%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 60.0%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricBangladeshiLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.4%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Excellent
1.9%

Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 28.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricBangladeshiLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%