Immigrants from Congo vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Ecuadorians
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,228,131 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 13.3 Ecuadorians.
Immigrants from Congo vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $91,574, a difference of 26.9%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $53,911, a difference of 24.6%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $82,070, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $54,958, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $39,117, a difference of 14.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,720 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,216 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,768 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,169 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,204 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,317 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $43,266 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,178 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $77,850 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,393 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 32.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 82.3% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.6%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.8% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 126.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.1% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.6%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.7% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |