Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Norway

Ecuadorians

Good
Poor
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,579,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 198.6 Ecuadorians.
Immigrants from Norway Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $41,958, a difference of 24.4%), median family income ($115,847 compared to $95,114, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $54,958, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $53,911, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $39,117, a difference of 9.5%), and median earnings ($51,758 compared to $45,214, a difference of 14.5%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NorwayEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,217
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,847
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,846
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,758
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,628
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,837
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,984
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,629
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,669
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,118
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.9%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 48.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 41.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NorwayEcuadorian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.9%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.7%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NorwayEcuadorian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NorwayEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.5%
Tragic
82.3%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (62.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NorwayEcuadorian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.9%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 98.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 29.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NorwayEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Tragic
4.5%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 58.4%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NorwayEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.7%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.2%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.5%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.8%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NorwayEcuadorian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%