German vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,305,847 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Germans corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 27.3%), householder income over 65 years ($59,730 compared to $54,958, a difference of 8.7%), and median family income ($102,254 compared to $95,114, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($83,358 compared to $82,070, a difference of 1.6%), median earnings ($45,935 compared to $45,214, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,531 compared to $91,574, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 61.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 56.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.67%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.8%), unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 40.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.1%), currently married (49.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and married-couple households (49.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.33%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 240.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 66.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 20.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 46.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 118.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.4%).