Romanian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Ecuadorians

Excellent
Poor
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,296,601 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 40.1 Ecuadorians.
Romanian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Romanian vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.0%), median family income ($111,243 compared to $95,114, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $54,958, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.52%), median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $39,117, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($50,244 compared to $45,214, a difference of 11.1%).
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricRomanianEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
22.9%

Romanian vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 42.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.75%).
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.9%

Romanian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.9%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%).
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%

Romanian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
82.3%

Romanian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.9%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.77%).
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianEcuadorian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Poor
33.3%

Romanian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 107.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.4%).
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
4.5%

Romanian vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 65.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Romanian vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricRomanianEcuadorian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%