Arapaho vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Ecuadorians
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,364,216 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.574. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 14.0 Ecuadorians.
Arapaho vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $41,958, a difference of 29.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $91,574, a difference of 27.7%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $39,117, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $54,958, a difference of 8.1%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $95,114, a difference of 15.9%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Arapaho vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 75.6%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.89%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
Arapaho vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 140.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 108.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 104.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Arapaho vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 82.3% |
Arapaho vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 41.6%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (66.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Poor 33.3% |
Arapaho vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 209.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 109.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 88.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 19.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 43.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 88.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Arapaho vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.4%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.0%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.34%), ged/equivalency (82.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Arapaho vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 65.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.2%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |